Infrastructure that passes the audit and the 3am incident.
I design and build AWS platforms as code: networks laid out properly, workloads that scale, pipelines that ship safely, and the evidence trail your auditors will one day ask for — priced for what you actually run.
The console got you live. It won't get you further.
Most AWS accounts grow by hand: a resource here, a permission there. It works — until the bill, the audit, or the outage asks questions nobody can answer.
The bill nobody can explain
Spend creeps up month over month, and no one can say which line items are load, which are waste, and which are a NAT gateway quietly moving terabytes.
Click-ops with admin keys
Changes happen in the console, by whoever, with credentials that never rotate. There is no history, no review, and no way to rebuild if it disappears.
The audit is suddenly real
A big client or an investor asks for SOC 2, and the scramble begins: where is the evidence, who has access to what, and when was the last tested backup?
Architecture, pipelines, and the paper trail
One engineer, senior level, hands on keyboard — from network design to the CI/CD pipeline your team ships through every day.
Architecture as code
VPCs, subnets and routing designed on purpose, workloads on ECS, EKS or plain EC2 — all of it in Terraform, applied through a pipeline, never by hand.
- Network design: VPC, subnets, NAT, security groups
- ECS / EKS / EC2 with autoscaling that actually scales
- IAM with least privilege, no shared credentials
- Multi-account layouts with SSO where teams need it
- GCP and Azure too — same approach, different console
CI/CD that ships safely
Pipelines in GitHub Actions or GitLab CI that build, test, and deploy with rollbacks ready — so releases are boring instead of brave.
- Build → test → staging → production, gated
- Blue/green or rolling deploys with instant rollback
- Secrets in a manager, never in the repo
- Monitoring and alerts wired before go-live, not after
Cost & compliance built in
The same review that finds waste also finds risk: right-sizing and savings plans on one side, audit evidence and encryption on the other.
- Cost review: right-sizing, storage, transfer traps
- Spot capacity and savings plans sized to real usage
- CloudTrail, encryption, tested backups by default
- SOC 1 / SOC 2 evidence produced by the platform itself
From read-only review to boring releases
No big-bang migration. The account keeps running while it is understood, codified, and improved in reviewable steps.
A call, and an honest answer
Twenty minutes on what you run and what hurts — bill, deploys, audit, outages. If you don't need an architect, I will say so.
Read-only review
With auditor-style access I map the architecture, security posture and spend, and hand you a written findings report — yours to keep either way.
Codify and fix, in reviewable steps
Existing infrastructure is imported into Terraform, then improved through pull requests you can read — network, IAM, pipelines, cost, in priority order.
Hand over, or stay on watch
Docs, diagrams, runbooks and a recorded walkthrough — then either a clean handover or a monthly arrangement for monitoring, patching and incidents.
The questions every team asks
Bring the bill. I'll bring the plan.
Twenty minutes, no slides. Tell me what you run and what worries you — I will tell you straight what I would fix first, and what it would cost.